Referências Bibliográficas - 1ª Parte
Equipe Editorial Bibliomed
O asterisco (*) designa um artigo que foi de especial valor para preparação deste
número de Population Reports.
1. ABATE, A. Population will reach 129 million in 2030. The Daily Monitor (Addis Ababa),
Nov. 28, 2000. p. 1.
2. ABDEL-TAWAB, N. The Clinical Services Improvement Project (PCSI) counseling training
program: Impact on providers and clients in Egypt. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of
Public Health, Population Communication Services, Jun. 1993. 39 p.
3. ABDEL-TAWAB, N., NAWAR, L., YOUSSEF, H., and HUNT-INGTON, D. Integrating issues of
sexuality into Egyptian family planning counseling. Frontiers report. Cairo, Egypt,
Population Council, Frontiers in Reproductive Health, Mar. 26, 2000. 47 p. (Available:
< http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/egypt_sex.pdf
>, Accessed Mar. 8, 2001)
4. ABDEL-TAWAB, N. and ROTER, D. The relevance of client-centered communication to family
planning settings in develop-ing countries: Lessons from the Egyptian experience. Social
Science and Medicine. (Forthcoming)
5. ABECASSIS, A.F. History of contraception in France. SOINS, Gynecologie, Obstetrique,
Puericulture, Pediatrie (141): 5-11. Feb. 1993.
6. ADAIR, L.S., VISWANATHAN, M., POLHAMUS, B., GUL-TIANO, S., and AVILA, J. Cebu
longitudinal health and nutrition survey follow-up study. Final report to the Women’s
Study Project. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International,
University of San Carlos, 1997. (Available: < http://www.fhi.org/en/wsp/wsfinal/fctshts/wsfct22.html
>, Accessed Apr. 4, 2001)
7. ADEWUYI, A., AJAEGBU, H., AYOOLA, G., BABALOLA, S., ESIMAII, G., KISSEKA, M., OMIDEYI,
K., THOMAS, K., ASKEW, I., and MENSCH, B. Nigeria: The family planning situation analysis
study. Final report. New York, Population Council, Africa Operations Research and
Technical Assistance Project, Nov. 1992. 30 p.
8. AGHAJANIAN, A. and MERHYAR, A.H. Comment: Fertility, contraceptive use and family
planning program activities in the Islamic Republic of Iran. International Family Planning
Perspectives 25(2): 12. Jun. 1999.
9. AKA-DAGO-AKRIBI, H., DU LOU , A.D., MSELLATI, P., DOS-SOU, R., and WELFFRENS-EKRA, C.
Issues surrounding repro-ductive choice for women living with HIV in Abidjan, Côte
d’Ivoire. Reproductive Health Matters 7(13): 20-29. May 1999.
10. ALI, M. and CLELAND, J. Contraceptive discontinuation in six developing countries: A
cause-specific analysis. International Family Planning Perspectives 21(3): 92-97. Sep.
1995.
11. ALI, N., WELLS, E., and SUTTON, D. Reviewing print mate-rial for oral contraceptives:
Direction for the future. Washington, D.C., Program for Appropriate Technology in Health,
Jul. 9, 1998. 70 p.
12. AMIN, R., BECKER, S., and BAYES, A. NGO-promoted microcredit programs and women’s
empowerment in rural Bangladesh: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Journal of
Developing Areas 32(2): 221-236. Winter 1998.
*13. ANDERSON, J.M. Empowering patients: Issues and strate-gies. Social Science and
Medicine 43(5): 697-705. Sep. 1996.
14. ANDERSON, L.A., MCEVOY DEVELLIS, B., and DEVELLIS, R.F. Effects of modeling on patient
communication, satisfaction, and knowledge. Medical Care 25(11): 1044-1056. Nov. 1987.
15. APROPO and SOCIAL MARKETING FOR CHANGE (SOMARC). APROPO establishes an innovative
agreement with commercial partners to contribute $50,000 up front to their CSM project.
SOMARC II Highlights: 1-2. Dec. 1992.
16. ARTICLE 19. Standards and recommendations. In: Coliver, S. The Right to Know: Human
Rights and Access to Reproduc-tive Health Information. London, Article 19, 1995. p.
327-355.
17. ASHOKE, S., KANE, T.T., and HAMAL, H. Contraceptive social marketing in Nepal:
Consumer and retailer knowledge, needs and experience. Journal of Biosocial Sciences 22:
305- 322. 1990.
18. ASIA WEEK. Philippines. Church vs. State: Fidel Ramos and family planning face
“Catholic Power”. Asia Week Aug. 24, 1994. p. 21-22.
19. ASKEW, I., MENSCH, B., and ADEWUYI, A. Indicators for measuring the quality of family
planning services in Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning 25(5): 268-283. Sep./Oct. 1994.
20. ASOCIACION HONDUREÑA DE PLANIFICACIÓN FAMIL-IAR (ASHONPLAFA) and FAMILY HEALTH
INTERNATIONAL. Purchasers of oral contraceptives in a social marketing pro-gram in
Honduras: Final report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras, ASHONPLAFA, Oct. 1987. 77 p.
21. ASSOCIATION FOR VOLUNTARY SURGICAL CONTRA-CEPTION (AVSC). Informed consent and
voluntary sterilization. An implementation guide for program managers. New York, AVSC,
1988. 31 p.
*22. AVSC INTERNATIONAL. Informed choice. New York, AVSC International, Folder. 1998.
23. AVSC INTERNATIONAL. Informed choice in family plan-ning: Legacies and challenges. New
York, AVSC International, 1998. 2 p.
24. AVSC INTERNATIONAL. Leadership in informed choice. New York, AVSC International, 1998.
4 p. 25. AVSC INTERNATIONAL. Informed choice assessment: Discussion guidelines. New York,
AVSC International, 2000. 7 p.
26. BAAH-BOAKYE, E.A. Husband-wife communication in fam-ily planning decisions in urban
Ghana. May 1988. 109 p. (Unpublished)
27. BANDURA, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1986.
28. BANGLADESH FAMILY PLANNING SOCIAL MARKETING PROJECT. Evaluation of illustrated support
material of Maya pill. 1982. 22 p. (Unpublished)
29. BANKOLE, A. and SINGH, S. Couples’ fertility and contra-ceptive decision-making
in developing countries: Hearing the man’s voice. International Family Planning
Perspectives 24(1): 15-24. Mar. 1998.
30. BARKAT-E-KHUDA, MIRZA, T., and AHMED, S. Lessons learned on doorstep delivery of
injectable contraceptives. Proceedings of the Workshop by the International Centre for
Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B) and the Maternal and Child Health-Family
Planning (MCH-FP) Extension Project, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Sep. 28, 1994. ICDDR,B, MCH-FP, 78
p.
31. BARNETT, B. Clients prefer method choices. Network 19(1): 14-18. Research Park
Triangle, North Carolina, Family Health International. Fall 1998.
32. BARNETT, B. First-time users have diverse needs. Network 19(4): 4-7. Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Summer 1999.
33. BARNETT, B. and STEIN, J. Women’s voices, women’s lives: The impact of
family planning. North Carolina, The Women’s Studies Project, Jun. 1998.
34. BECKER, J. and LEITMAN, E. Introducing sexuality within family planning: The
experience of the HIV/STD prevention projects from Latin America and the Caribbean. New
York, Population Council, 1998. (Quality/Calidad/Qualite No. 8) 28 p.
35. BEDIMO, A.L., BESSINGER, R., and KISSINGER, P. Reproductive choices among HIV-positive
women. Social Science and Medicine 46(2): 171-179. Jan. 1998.
36. BEGUM, H. Health care, ethics and nursing in Bangladesh: A personal perspective.
Nursing Ethics 5(6): 535-541. Nov. 1998.
37. BEISECKER, A.E. and BEISECKER, T.D. Patient information-seeking behaviors when
communicating with doctors. Medical Care 28(1): 19-28. Jan. 1990.
38. BERTAKIS, K.D., ROTER, D., and PUTNAM, S.M. The rela-tionship of physician medical
interview style to patient satisfaction. The Journal of Family Practice 32(2): 135-136.
Feb. 1991.
39. BERTRAND, J.T., HARDEE, K., MAGNANI, R.J., and ANGLE, M.A. Access, quality of care,
and medical barriers in family planning programs. International Family Planning
Perspectives 21(2): 64-74. Jun. 1995.
40. BERTRAND, J.T. and KINCAID, L.D. Evaluating Information-Education- Communication (IEC)
programs for family planning and reproductive health. Final report of the IEC Working
Group. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Carolina Population Center, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Tulane University Center for International Health and
Development, The Futures Group, Oct. 1996. 161 p.
41. BERTRAND, J.T., RICE, J., SULLIVAN, T.M., and SHELTON, J. Skewed method mix: A measure
of quality in family planning programs. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, MEASURE Evaluation,
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, May 2000. 41 p.
(Available: http://
www.cpc.unc. edu/measure/publications/working/papers/wp0023ab.html)
42. BEST, K. CARE project enlists community support. Network 17(2): 11-13. Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Spring 1999.
43. BEST, K. City life isolates many clients. Network 17(2): 13. Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, Family Health International. Spring 1999.
44. BEST, K. Social contacts influence method use. Network 19(4): 12-15. Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Summer 1999.
45. BHUSHAN, I. Understanding unmet need. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Center for
Communication Programs, Nov. 1997. (Available: http://www.jhuccp.org/
pubs/working_papers/ wp4/contents.html)
46. BIDDLECOM, A.E. and FAPOHUNDA, B.M. Covert contra-ceptive use: Prevalence,
motivations, and consequences. [Policy Research Division Working Papers No. 108]. New
York, Population Council, 1998. 37 p.
47. BITRAN, R.A. and MCINNES, D.K. The demand for health care in Latin America. Lessons
from the Dominican Republic and El Salvador. Proceedings of the EDI, Washington, D.C.,
1993. World Bank, 54 p.
48. BLACKBURN, R. New contraceptive choices. [Outline]. Population Reports, Series M, No.
16. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Population
Information Program, Nov. 2000. 3 p.
49. BLANEY, C.L. Long-acting methods require special care. Network 15(1): 18-21. Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Aug. 1994.
50. BLANEY, C.L. Important needs follow pregnancy. Network 17(4). Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, Family Health International. Summer 1997. (Available: http://www.fhi.org/)
51. BLUMENTHAL, P.D. and MCINTOSH, N. Pocket guide for family planning providers
1996-1998. 2nd ed. Oliveras, E., ed. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Program for International
Education in Reproductive Health, 1996. 399 p.
52. BONGAARTS, J. and WATKINS, S.C. Social interactions and contemporary fertility
transitions. [Research Division Working Papers No. 88]. New York, Population Council,
1996. 69 p.
53. BOSVELD, W. Explaining between-country variation in fertility: The theoretical link
between individual behaviour and social context. Amsterdam, Postdoctorale
Onderzoekersopleiding Demografie, Aug. 1998. (Nethur-Demography Paper No. 41) 17 p.
54. BOULAY, M. Change in social networks and the adoption of family planning: A study in
rural Nepal. Presented at the 20th International Sunbelt Social Network Conference,
Vancouver, B.C., Apr. 13-15, 2000.
55. BOULAY, M. The influence of information-seeking strategies on social network
composition and contraceptive adoption among women in rural Nepal. Presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, Mar. 23-25, 2000. Johns
Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs.
40 p.
56. BOULAY, M., STOREY, D.J., and SOOD, S. Indirect exposure to a family planning mass
media campaign in Nepal. [Draft]. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University, Center for
Communication Programs, Nov. 4, 1999.
57. BRADDOCK, C.H., EDWARDS, K.A., HASENBERG, N.M., LAIDLEY, T.L., and LEVINSON, W.
Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics. Journal of
the American Medical Association 282(24): 2313-2320. Dec. 1999.
58. BRADLEY, J., BRUCE, J., DIAZ, S., HUEZO, C., and MWO-RIA, K. Using COPE to improve
quality of care: The experience of the family planning association of Kenya. New York,
Population Council, 1999. (Quality/Calidad/Qualite No. 9) 19 p. (Available: http://www.popcouncil.org/publications/qcq/qcq09.pdf,
Accessed Mar. 21, 2001)
*59. BRUCE, J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in
Family Planning 21(2): 61-91. Mar./Apr. 1990.
60. BRUCE, J. and JAIN, A. Improving the quality of care through operations research. In:
Seidman, M. and Horn, M.C. Operations Research: Helping Family Planning Programs Work
Better. New York, Wiley-Liss, 1991. p. 259-282.
61. BUTTA, P. Informed consent and voluntary sterilization: An implementation guide for
program managers. New York, AVSC International, 1995. 26 p.
62. CACHAN, J. and MARSHALL, M. Implementing reproduc-tive health awareness: Progress to
date. Advances in Contra-cep-tion 13(2-3): 363-371. Jun./Sep. 1997.
63. CARIGNAN, C.S., IPPOLITO, L., and NERSESIAN, P.V. SEATS II: Clinical protocols for
family planning programs: A resource book. Volume I. AVSC International and John Snow,
Oct. 1995.
64. CARLOS, A.C. Trends and directions. In: Carlos, A.C. Male Involvement in Family
Planning: Programme Initiatives. London, International Planned Parenthood Federation,
1984. p. 1-8.
65. CASTRO MARTIN, T. The impact of women’s education on fertility in Latin America:
Searching for explanations. International Family Planning Perspectives 21(2): 52-57, 80.
Jun. 1995. (Available:
66. CATES, W., JR., STEINER, M.J., and RAYMOND, E.G. Dual vs. duel(ing) protection against
unintended pregnancy and sexu- ally transmitted infections: What is the best contraceptive
approach? [Draft]. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International,
Jan. 8, 2001. 20 p.
67. CATINO, J. Meeting the Cairo challenge: Progress in sexual and reproductive health.
Implementing the ICPD Programme of Action. New York, Family Care International, Oct. 1999.
190 p. 68. CEGALA, D.J. The effects of communication skills training on patients’
participation during medical interviews. Presented at the Health Communication Division of
the National Communication Association Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, Nov. 1999. Ohio State
University. 31 p.
69. CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES, JOHNS HOPKINS UNI-VERSITY, and JOINT COMMISSION
INTERNATIONAL. Improving interpersonal communication between health care providers and
patients. Core course. Reference manual 1999. Bethesda, Maryland, Center for Human
Services, 1999. 40 p.
70. CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE LAW AND POLICY (CRLP). Women of the world: Laws and policies
affecting their repro-ductive lives. Anglophone Africa. New York, CRLP, May 1997. 52 p.
71. CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE LAW AND POLICY (CRLP). Nothing personal: A human rights report
on the provision of sur -gical sterilization in Peru, 1996-1998. New York, CRLP, Mar.
2000. 20 p.
72. CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND POPULATION ACTIV-ITIES (CEDPA). Institution-building for
quality services. New York, United Nations. Population Division. Department for Economic
and Social Information and Policy Analysis., 1996. p. 388-394.
73. CHARLES, C., WHELAN, T., and GAFNI, A. What do we mean by partnership in making
decisions about treatment? British Medical Journal 319: 780-782. Sep. 18, 1999.
(Available:
74. CHARLES, C., GAFNI, A., and WHELAN, T. Shared decision-making in the medical
encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and
Medicine 44(5): 681-692. Mar. 1997.
75. CHERKAOUI, M. Fertile changes. ORGYN: 27-32. 1995.
76. CHI, I.C. and JONES, D.B. Incidence, risk factors, and pre-vention of
poststerilization regret in women: An updated inter-national review from an
epidemiological perspective. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 49(10): 722-732. Oct.
1994.
77. CHINA POPULATION TODAY. Quality services for Shanghai couples. Urban family planning
programme. China Population Today, Vol. 14, No. 1, Feb. 1997. p. 9.
78. CHU, J. Quality reorientation of the family planning pro-gram in China: Some
conceptual issues. Boston, Massa-chusetts, Harvard Center for Population and Development
Studies, Dec. 1999. 41 p. (Available:
79. CLARK, S. and SPIELER, J. Natural family planning: U.S. Agency for International
Development policy considerations. In: Jennings, J.T., Spieler, J.M., Von Hertzen, H., and
Queenan, V.H., eds. Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Family Planning: Current
Knowledge and New Strategies for the 1990s, Washington, D.C., Dec. 10-14, 1990. p. 88-90.
80. CLARKE, L.L., SCHMITT, K., BONO, C.A., STEELE, J., and MILLER, M.K. Norplant selection
and satisfaction among low-income women. American Journal of Public Health 88(8): 1175-
1181. Aug. 1998.
81. CLELAND, J. and MAULDIN, W.P. The promotion of family planning by financial payments:
The case of Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning 22(1): 1-18. Jan./Feb. 1991.
82. CLELAND, J. and WILSON, C. Demand theories of the fer-tility transition: An
iconoclastic view. Population Studies 41(1): 5-30. Mar. 1987.
83. COGGINS, C., LANGER, A., WINIKOFF, B., LAZCANO, E.C., HEIMBURGER, A., and SLOAN, N.
Effectiveness of inte-gration of self-screening of STDs into family planning programs.
Presented at the American Public Health Association 126th Annual Meeting, Washington,
D.C., Nov. 15-18, 1998.
84. COHEN, W.J. Freedom of choice (family planning). Studies in Family Planning 1(23):
2-5. Dec. 1964.
85. COLEY, K.C. Contraception: What pharmacists should tell their patients. American
Pharmacy 33(9): 55-66. Sep. 1993. 86. COLIVER, S. Algeria. In: Coliver, S. The Right to
Know: Human Rights and Access to Reproductive Health Information. London, Article 19,
1992. p. 99-120.
*87. COLIVER, S., ed. The right to know: Human rights and access to reproductive health
information. London, Article 19, 1995. 391 p.
88. CONSORTIUM FOR EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION and PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY IN
HEALTH (PATH). Medical and service delivery quidelines.
89. COTTEN, N., STANBACK, J., MAIDOUKA, H., TAYLOR-THOMAS, J.T., and TURK, T. Early
discontinuation of contra-ceptive use in Niger and The Gambia. International Family
Planning Perspectives 18(4): 145-149. Dec. 1992.
*90. COTTINGHAM, J. Beyond acceptability: Users’ perspectives on contraception.
London, World Health Organization, 1997. p. 1-5.
91. CURTIS, S. and NEITZEL, K. Contraceptive knowledge, use, and sources. Calverton,
Maryland, Macro International, Mar. 1996. (DHS Comparative Studies No. 19) 100 p.
92. CURTIS, S.L. and BLANC, A.K. Determinants of contracep-tive failure, switching, and
discontinuation: An analysis of DHS contraceptive histories. Calverton, Maryland, Macro
International, Oct. 1997. (Demographic and Health Surveys Analytical Reports No. 6) 50 p.
93. DABIRI, O.M. The way forward: Nigeria’s population. Oct./Dec. 1993. p. 30-31, 34.
94. DADIAN, M.J. Protection vs. protectionism? AIDS Captions 4(1): 9. Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Jun. 1997.
95. DANIELS, D. and EDWARDS-LOPEZ, J. Overview of the EC’s health, AIDS and
population portfolio in developing coun-tries (1990-1999). London, European Commission
Council, Oct. 2000. 1 p. (Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/develop-ment/
sector/social/pfolio3011_en.htm)
96. DAVANZO, J. and GRAMMICH, C. Barren ground: Eastern Europe’s transition from
communism isn’t the only factor affecting the region’s demographics.
97. DAVID, H.P. and BABAN, A. Women’s health and repro-ductive rights: Romanian
experience. Patient Education and Counseling 28(3): 235-245. Jul. 1996.
98. DAVIS, A. and WYSOCKI, S. Clinician/patient interaction: Communicating the benefits
and risks of oral contraceptives. Contraception 59(1 Suppl.): S39-42. Jan. 1999.
99. DEBER, R.B., KRAETSCHMER, N., and IRVINE, J. What role do patients wish to play in
treatment decision making? Archives of Internal Medicine 156(13): 1414-1420. Jul. 8, 1996.
*100. DELBANCO, T.L. and DALEY, J. Through the patient’s eyes: Strategies toward more
successful contraception. Obstetrics and Gynecology 88(3 Suppl.): S41-47. Sep. 1996.
101. DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (DFID). China. London, DFID, 2000. 1 p.
(Available: www.dfid.org.uk/public/what/advisory/group4/faq7.html)
102. DIAZ, J. and DIAZ, M. Quality of care in family planning in Latin America. Advances
in Contraception 9(2): 117-128. Jun. 1993.
*103. DIAZ, M., JASIS, M.I., PACHAURI, S., PINE, R.N., PLATA, M.I., RUMINJO, J., STEELE,
C., TABBUTT-HENRY, J., and WIDYANTORO, N.S. Informed choice in international family
planning service delivery. Strategies for the 21st century. New York, AVSC International,
1999. 22 p.
104. DIMATTEO, M.R. The physician-patient relationship: Effects on the quality of health
care. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 37(1): 149-161. Mar. 1994.
105. DIMATTEO, M.R., REITER, R.C., and GAMBONE, J.C. Enhancing medication adherence
through communication and informed collaborative choice. Health Communication 6(4):
253-265. Oct./Dec. 1994.
106. DIXON-MEULLER, R. Gender inequalities and reproduc-tive health: Changing priorities
in an era of social transformation and globalisation. Belgium, International Union for the
Scientific Study of Population, 1999. (Policy and Research Paper No. 16) (Available: www.iussp.org/Publications_
on_site/PRP/prp16.htm)
*107. DIXON-MUELLER, R. Population policy and women’s rights: Transforming
reproductive choice. Westport, Connecticut, Praeger, 1993. 300 p.
108. DKT INTERNATIONAL (DKT). 1998 contraceptive social marketing statistics. Washington,
D.C., DKT, Sep. 1999. 8 p.
109. DONABEDIAN, A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American
Medical Association 260(12): 1743-1748. Sep. 23-30, 1988.
110. DONOVAN, J.L. Patient decision making: The missing ingredient in compliance research.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 11(3): 443-455. Summer 1995.
111. DRENNAN, M. Reproductive health: New perspectives on men’s participation.
Population Reports, Series J, No. 46. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Population Information Program, Oct. 1998. 35 p.
112. DUBE, H.M.B., MARANGWANDA, C.S., and NDHLOVU, L. An assessment of the Zimbabwe family
planning programme. Results from the 1996 situation analysis study. Harare, Zimbabwe,
Zimbabwe National Family Planning Council, Population Council, May 1998. 53 p.
113. DUCLAYAN, G. and HAREL, K. When choosing a contra-ceptive, women know best. Momentum:
News from the Population Council [Newsletter], Sep. 1999. p. 8-9.
114. EDMUNDS, M., STRACHAN, D., and VRIESENDORP, S. Client-responsive family planning: A
handbook for providers. Watertown, Massachusetts, Pathfinder Fund, 1987. 93 p.
115. EDOZIEN, L. Counselling for female sterilisation. British Journal of Family Planning
23(1): 14-15. Apr. 1997.
116. EDWARDS, A. and ELWYN, G. The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical
medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 282(8): 779-780. Aug. 25, 1999.
117. EGYPT. CENTRAL AGENCY FOR PUBLIC MOBILIZATION AND STATISTICS (CAPMAS), WOMEN AND
CHILD RESEARCH UNIT, and UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND (UNICEF) EGYPT. The situation
of women in Egypt. Cairo, CAPMAS, UNICEF, 1991. 61 p.
118. ENDE, J., KAZIS, L., ASH, A., and MOSKOWITZ, M.A. Measuring patients’ desire for
autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. The
Journal of General Internal Medicine 4(1): 23-30. Jan./Feb. 1989.
119. ENE, E.N. Family planning, fertility control and the law in Nigeria: The choices for
a new century. African Journal of Reproductive Health 2(2): 82-95. Oct. 1998.
120. ENGENDERHEALTH. Building coalitions.
121. ENTWISLE, B., RINDFUSS, R.R., GUILKEY, D.K., CHAM-RATRITHIRONG, A., CURRAN, S.R., and
SAWANGDEE, Y. Community and contraceptive choice in rural Thailand: A case study of Nang
Rong. Demography 33(1): 1-11. Feb. 1996.
122. EVALUATION PROJECT, SERVICE DELIVERY WORKING GROUP, and QUALITY SUBCOMMITTEE.
Indicators of quality of care in family planning programs. Mar. 31, 1993. 7 p.
(Unpublished)
123. EVANS, I. and HUEZO, C., eds. Family planning hand-book for health professionals: The
sexual and reproductive health approach. London, International Planned Parenthood
Federation, 1997. 387 p.
124. EXPERT PANEL ON EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION. Consensus statement on emergency
contraception. Bellagio con-ference on emergency contraception. Bellagio, Italy, South to
South Cooperation in Reproductive Health, May 15, 1995. 8 p.
125. FADEN, R.R., BEAUCHAMP, T.L., and KING, N.M. A his-tory and theory of informed
consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986. 389 p.
126. FAMCARE. Retailer’s contraceptive training manual for Liberia. Monrovia,
Liberia, Famcare, 1988. 74 p.
127. FAMILY PLANNING LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT and JOHN SNOW INC (JSI). Programs that deliver:
Logistics’ contri -butions to better health in developing countries. [report].
Arlington, Virginia, JSI, 2000. 117 p.
128. FAMILY PLANNING SERVICE EXPANSION AND TECHNI-CAL SUPPORT (SEATS) PROJECT. Vital
connections: Linking women’s literacy programs and reproductive health services.
Arlington, Virginia, John Snow, Inc, World Education, Inc, Jul. 1999. 50 p.
129. FATHALLA, M.F. Family planning linked to an obstetric service. Tropical Doctor 18(1):
25-29. Jan. 1988.
130. FATHALLA, M.F. A woman-centered agenda for the twen-ty- first century. Advances in
Contraception 12(4): 331-334. Dec. 1996.
131. FEDERATION OF FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATIONS OF MALAYSIA. Family planning and sexual
and reproductive health programs.
132. FEELEY, F. Conducting regulatory assessments for commer-cial sector family planning.
A summary. Arlington, Virginia, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International, Promoting
Financial Investments and Transfers to Involve the Commercial Sector in Family Planning,
1997. 4 p.
133. FERREROS, C., CLEMENTE, W., and LEMOS FERNANDES, M.E. The impact of social marketing
on the condom market in Brazil. Proceedings of the Third USAID HIV/AIDS Prevention
Conference, Washington, D.C., Aug. 7-9, 1995. p. 9
134. FIGUEROA, B. Adding color to life: Illustrated health mate-rials for women in Peru.
New York, Population Council, 1992. (Quality/Calidad/Qualite No. 4) p. 13-18.
135. FINGER, W.R. Commercial sector can improve access. Network 18(2): 12-15. Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International. Winter 1998.
136. FINGER, W.R. and KHALAF, S.G. Contraceptive methods for young adults. [Chart].
Network 17(3): 16-17. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International.
Spring 1997.
137. FOGARTY, J.S. Reactance theory and patient noncompli-ance. Social Science and
Medicine 45(8): 1277-1288. Oct. 1997. 138. FONTAINE, A., POTTER, L., and VENEY, J.E.
Use-effectiveness of oral contraceptives and quality of care. Apr. 25, 1993. 28 p.
(Unpublished)
*139. FOSTER, P. and HUDSON, S. From compliance to con-cordance: A challenge for
contraceptive prescribers. Health Care Analysis 6(2): 123-130. Jun. 1998.
140. FRANK, M.L., POINDEXTER, A.N., JOHNSON, M.L., and BATEMAN, L. Characteristics and
attitudes of early contracep -tive implant acceptors in Texas. Family Planning
Perspectives 24(5): 208-213. Sep./Oct. 1992.
141. FRASER, I.S., TIITINEN, A., AFFANDI, B., BRACHE, V., CROXATTO, H.B., DIAZ, S.,
GINSBURG, J., GU, S., HOLMA, P., and JOHANSSON, E. Norplant consensus statement and
background review. Contraception 57(1): 1-9. Jan. 1998.
142. FREEDMAN, L.P. and ISAACS, S.L. Human rights and reproductive choice. Studies in
Family Planning 24(1): 18-30. Jan./Feb. 1993.
143. FREEDMAN, R. Do family planning programs affect fertili -ty preferences? A literature
review. Studies In Family Planning 28(1): 1-13. Mar. 1997.
144. FREEMAN, M.A. Measuring equality: A comparative per-spective on women’s legal
capacity and constitutional rights in five commonwealth countries. Berkeley Women’s
Law Journal 5: 110-138. 1989-1990.
145. FRIEDMAN, I. Poverty, human rights, and health. In: Crisp, N. and Ntuli, A., eds.
South African Health Review. 5th ed. Durban, South Africa, Health Systems Trust, 1999. 12
p. (Available:
146. FROSCH, D.L. and KAPLAN, R.M. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: Past
research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 17(4): 285-294.
Nov. 1999.
147. FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL. Pharmacist’s contra-ceptive training manual. Ghana
Social Marketing Programme. 1992. 85 p. (Unpublished)
148. FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL and SOCIAL MAR-KETING FOR CHANGE (SOMARC). Ghana Social
Marketing Program tracking survey 1988: Report and analysis. Washington, D.C., SOMARC,
Nov. 1989. 130 p.
149. GAFNI, A., CHARLES, C., and WHELAN, T. The physician-patient encounter: The physician
as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model.
Social Science and Medicine 47(3): 347-354. 1998.
150. GALLEN, M., LETTENMAIER, C., and GREEN, C.P. Counseling makes a difference.
Population Reports, Series J, No. 35, Baltimore. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Population Information Program, Nov. 1987. p. 31.
151. GALWAY, K. and STOVER, J. Determining an appropriate contraceptive method mix.
OPTIONS II tool: Policy and pro -grammatic use of DHS data analysis chapter. [Draft]. May
4, 1994. 79 p. (Unpublished)
152. GANDOTRA, M.M. and DAS, N.P. Contraceptive choice, shift, and use continuation: A
prospective study in Gujarat. Journal of Family Welfare 36(3): 54-69. Sep. 1990.
153. GANDOTRA, M.M. and DAS, N.P. Factors influencing choice of a contraceptive and the
reasons for its discontinua-tion. In: Khan, M.E. and Cernada, G. Spacing as an Alternative
Strategy. India’s Family Welfare Programme. Delhi, India, B.R. Publishing
Corporation, 1996. p. 95-114.
154. GARATE, M.R., MOSTAJO, P., ROSEN, J.E., and ROJO, M. CBD promoter incentives for IUD
insertion referral: Can they lead to client coercion and abuse? Findings from Peru.
Proceedings of the 119th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association,
Atlanta, Georgia, Nov. 11-14, 1991. 17 p. (Unpublished)
155. GARDNER, R., BLACKBURN, R.D., and UPADHYAY, U.D. Closing the condom gap. Population
Reports, Series H, No. 9. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population
Information Program, April 1999. 36 p.
156. GAWANDE, A. Whose body is it, anyway? What doctors should do when patients make bad
decisions. Annals of Medicine, The New Yorker, Oct. 4, 1999. p. 84-91.
157. GAY, J. A literature review of the client-provider interface in maternal and child
health and family planning clinics in Latin America. Washington, D.C., Pan American Health
Organization, Nov. 1980. 78 p.
158. GAZIANO, C. The knowledge gap: An analytical review of media effects. Communication
Research 10(4): 447-486. Oct. 1983.
159. GEARY, J. From comparison to choices. The voice of the voiceless. ORGYN (4): 10-13.
1994.
160. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY. Deciding whether to use natural family planning: The couple
decision-making process. Georgetown University, Mar. 30, 2000. p. 1-17.
161. GERMAN MINISTRY OF COOPERATION AND DEVELOP-MENT (BMZ). BMZ aktuell. Sector Policy.
Bonn, Ger-many, BMZ, Jun. 1991. 24 p.
162. GERTNER, N. Interference with reproductive choice. In: Cohen, S. and Taub, N.
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society.
Clifton, New Jersey, Humana Press, 1989. p. 307-328.
163. GODLEY, J. Kinship networks and contraceptive choice in Nang Rong, Thailand.
International Family Planning Perspectives 27(1): 4-10, 41. Mar. 2001. (Available:
164. GOODKIND, D. and PHAN, T.A. Reasons for rising con-dom use in Vietnam. International
Family Planning Perspectives 23(4): 173-178. Dec. 1997.
165. GRADY, W.R., HAYWARD, M.D., BILLY, J.O., and FLO-REY, F.A. Contraceptive switching
among currently married women in the United States. Journal of Biosocial Science (11
Suppl.): S117-132. 1989.
166. GRAY, A., CHOWDHURY, J.H., CALDWELL, B., and AL-SABIR, A. “Traditional”
family planning in Bangladesh. Summary report. Dhaka, Bangladesh, Population Council,
1997. 41 p.
167. GREADY, M., KLUGMAN, B., XABA, M., BOIKANYO, E., and REES, H. South African
women’s experiences of contracep -tion and contraceptive services. In: Ravindran,
S.T.K., Berer, M., and Cottingham, J., eds. Beyond Acceptability: Users’ Perspectives
on Contraception. London, World Health Organization. Reproductive Health Matters, 1997. p.
23-35. (Available:
168. GREENFIELD, S., KAPLAN, S.H., WARE, J.E., JR., MARTIN YANO, E., and FRANK, H.J.L.
Patients’ participation in medical care: Effects on blood sugar control and quality
of life in dia-betes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 3(5): 448-457. Sep./Oct. 1988.
169. GREENSPAN, A. Adding choice to the contraceptive mix: Lessons from Indonesia.
Asia-Pacific Population and Policy (19): 1-4. Dec. 1991.
170. GREENWELL, K.F. Contraceptive method mix menu: Providing healthy choices for women.
World Health Statistics Quarterly 49(2): 88-93. 1996.
171. GUADAGNOLI, E. and WARD, P. Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science
and Medicine 47(3): 329-339. Aug. 1998.
172. GUZMAN GARCIA, S., SNOW, R., and AITKEN, I. Preferences for contraceptive attributes:
Voices of women in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. International Family Planning Perspectives
23(2): 52-58. Jun. 1997.
173. HALL, J.A., ROTER, D.L., and KATZ, N.R. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider
behavior in medical encounters. Medical Care 26(7): 657-675. Jul. 1988.
174. HAQUE, I., KANE, T.T., ROY, N.C., MOZUMDER, K.A., and KHUDA, B.E. Contraceptive
switching patterns in rural Bangladesh. In: Kane, T.T. and Phillips, J.F. Reproductive
Health in Rural Bangladesh: Policy and Programmatic Impli-cations. Vol. 1. Dhaka,
Bangladesh, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Jul. 1997. p.
217-246.
175. HARDEE, K., AGARWAL, K., LUKE, N., WILSON, E., PENDZICH, M., FARRELL, M., and CROSS,
H. Post-Cairo repro -ductive health policies and programs: A comparative study of eight
countries. Futures Group International, POLICY Project, 1998. 69 p.
176. HARDEE, K., CLYDE, M., MCDONALD, O.P., BAILEY, W., and VILLINSKI, M.T. Assessing
family planning service-delivery practices: The case of private physicians in Jamaica.
Studies in Family Planning 26(6): 338-349. Nov./Dec. 1995.
177. HARDEE, K., JANOWITZ, B., STANBACK, J., and VILLINS-KI, M.T. What have we learned
from studying changes in service guidelines and practices? International Family Planning
Perspectives 24(2): 84-90. Jun. 1998.
178. HARDON, A. Reproductive rights in practice: A compara-tive assessment of quality of
care. In: Hardon, A. and Hayes, E. Reproductive Rights in Practice: A Feminist Report on
Quality of Care. London, Zed Books, 1997. p. 193-222.
179. HARDON, A. Reviewing quality of care policies. In: Hardon, A., Mutua, A., Kabir, S.,
and Engelkes, E., eds. Monitoring Family Planning and Reproductive Rights. London, Zed
Books, 1997. p. 23-30
180. HARDY, E., BAHAMONDES, L., OSIS, M.J., COSTA, R.G., and FAÚNDES, A. Risk factors for
tubal sterilization regret, detectable before surgery. Contraception 54(3): 159-162. Sep.
1996.
181. HARDY, E., GOODSON, P., DE SOUZA, T.R., and RODRIGUEZ, C.M. Factors associated with
the acceptance of Norplant or IUD among women with similar socio-demograph -ic
characteristics. Advances in Contraception 7(1): 95-105. Mar. 1991.
182. HATCHER, R.A., RINEHART, W., BLACKBURN, R., GELLER, J.S., and SHELTON, J.D. The
essentials of contraceptive technology. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Population Information Program, Jul. 1997. 340 p.
183. HATCHER, R.A., TRUSSELL, J., STEWART, F., CATES, W., STEWART, G.K., GUEST, F., and
KOWAL, D. Contraceptive technology. 17th ed. New York, Irvington Publishers, Inc., 1998.
184. HAWS, J.M., BUTTA, P.G., and GIRVIN, S. A comprehen-sive and efficient process for
counseling patients desiring sterili -zation. Nurse Practitioner 22(6): 52, 55-56, 59-61.
Jun. 1997.
185. HEICHELHEIM, J., HOLSCHER, M., MEEKERS, D., and PIRVULESCU, M. Pharmacist survey of
contraceptive availabili -ty, knowledge and practices, Romania. Bucharest, Romania,
Population Services International, 1998. 43 p.
186. HEISE, L., ELLSBERG, M., and GOTTEMOELLER, M. Ending violence against women.
Population Reports, Series L, No. 11, Baltimore. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Population Information Program, Sept. 1999. 44 p.
*187. HEISE, L.L. Beyond acceptability: Reorienting research on contraceptive choice. In:
Ravindran, S.T.K., Berer, M., and Cottingham, J., eds. Beyond Acceptability: Users
Perspectives on Contraception. Geneva, World Health Organization, Reproductive Health
Matters, 1997. p. 6-14.
188. HODGINS, S.R. Contraceptive discontinuation in Togo and women’s experience with
method use and services. Dissertation, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, 2000. 233 p.
189. HOLDEN, C. “Right-to-life” scores new victory at AID. Science 229(4718):
1065-1067. Sep. 13, 1985.
190. HOLLERBACH, P.E. Factors that determine the appropri -ateness of new technologies to
consumer needs. New York, Population Council, Center for Policy Studies, 1982. (Working
Papers No. 94) 65 p.
191. HUBACHER, D., GOCO, N., GONZALEZ, B., and TAY-LOR, D. Factors affecting continuation
rates of DMPA. Contraception 60(6): 345-351. Dec. 1999.
192. HUEZO, C. and BRITTON, A. [IPPF’s official policy on informed choice of
contraception] Personal communication, Jan. 29, 2001.
*193. HUEZO, C. and MALHOTRA, U. Choice and use-continu -ation of methods of
contraception: A multicentre study. London, International Planned Parenthood Federation,
1993. 176 p.
194. HULL, T.H. The challenge of contraceptive implant removals in East Nusa Tenggara,
Indonesia. International Family Planning Perspectives 24(4): 176-179. Dec. 1998.
(Available: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2417698.html)
195. HUNTINGTON, D., LETTENMAIER, C., and OBENG-QUAIDOO, I. User’s perspective of
counseling training in Ghana: The “mystery client” trial. Studies in Family
Planning 21(3): 171-177. May/Jun. 1990.
196. INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (IRH). GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER.
Research up-date: Testing approaches to improve reproductive health knowl -edge, attitudes
and skills. Washington, D.C., IRH, Aug. 25, 1999.
197. INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DIARRHOEAL DISEASE RESEARCH BANGLADESH (ICDDR) and MATERNAL
AND CHILD HEALTH FAMILY PLANNING (MCH-FP) EXTENSION PROJECT. The Matlab Project: Lessons
for policy. Dhaka, Bangladesh, ICDDR, MCH-FP Extension Project, Dec. 1987. (MCH-FP
Extension Project Briefing Paper No. 1) 5 p.
198. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS (FIGO) and FIGO COMMITTEE FOR
THE STUDY OF ETHICAL ASPECT OF HUMAN REPRODUCTION. Ethical framework for gynecologic and
obstetric care. Recommendations on ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology. London,
FIGO, 1997. 9 p.
199. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR POPULATION SCI-ENCES (IIPS) and MACRO INTERNATIONAL INC.
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-1999: India. Mumbai, India, IIPS, 2000. 443
p.
200. INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL STATISTICS (IMS) HEALTH. Pharmaceutical Index 1997-2000.
Hormonal contraceptive Egypt market study. Cham, Switzerland, IMS Health, 2000.
201. INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERA-TION (IPPF). Effect of counselling on
use-continuation of con - traception. Highlights from an IPPF study. IPPF Medical Bulletin
27(6): 3-4. Dec. 1993.
202. INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERA-TION (IPPF). IPPF Charter on sexual and
reproductive rights. London, IPPF, 1996. 63 p.
203. INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERA-TION (IPPF) and INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL
ADVISORY PANEL. Statement on dual protection against unwanted preg-nancy and sexually
transmitted infections, including HIV. London, IPPF, May 2000. 3 p.
204. INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERA-TION (IPPF) and WORKING GROUP ON THE
PROMOTION OF FAMILY PLANNING AS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT. The human right to family planning.
November 1983. London, IPPF, 1984. 52 p.
205. IRELAND. Health, Family Planning Amendment Act, 1992. Oireachtas (20): 1-9. Dublin,
Ireland, Jul. 1992.
206. IRWANTO, PRASADJA, H., SUNARNO, N., POERWAN-DARI, E.K., HARDEE, K., EGGLESTON, E.,
and HULL, T. In the shadow of men: Reproductive decision-making and women’s
psychological well-being in Indonesia. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
Women’s Studies Project, Family Health International, Dec. 1997. 69 p. (Available:
< http://www.fhi.org/en/wsp/wsfinal/pfds/indo4.pdf>,
Accessed Mar. 28, 2001)
207. ISAACS, S.L. Incentives, population policy, and reproduc-tive rights: Ethical issues.
Studies in Family Planning 26(6): 363- 367. Nov./Dec. 1995.
208. ISLAM, N.M. and RAHMAN, M.M. Client satisfaction with sterlization procedure in
Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 8(1): 39-52. Mar. 1993.
209. JACOBSON, J.L. Transforming family planning pro-grammes: Towards a framework for
advancing the reproductive rights agenda. Reproductive Health Matters 8(15): 21-32. May
2000.
210. JAFFE, F.S. Commentary: Some policy and program impli -cations of “Contraceptive
Failure in the United States”. Family Planning Perspectives 5(3): 143-144. Summer
1973.
211. JAIN, A. Walking the walk: Reproductive health and fami -ly planning programs.
Proceedings of the Cooperating Agencies Meeting on Reproductive Health Approach to Family
Planning, Washington, D.C., Feb. 25, 1994. Population Council, p. 78-89.
*212. JAIN, A. Should eliminating unmet need for contraception continue to be a program
priority? International Family Planning Perspectives 25 (Suppl.): S39-43, S49. Jan. 1999.
213. JAIN, A. Reproductive health approach to family planning: Implications for evaluating
its impact. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los
Angeles, Mar. 23-25, 2000. Population Council, p. 23.
214. JAIN, A. and BRUCE, J. A reproductive health approach to the objectives and
assessment of family planning programs. In: Sen, G., Germain, A., and Chen, L.C.
Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment and Rights. Boston, Harvard
University Press, Mar. 1994. p. 194-209.
215. JAIN, A.K. Fertility reduction and the quality of family plan -ning services. Studies
in Family Planning 20(1): 1-16. Jan./Feb. 1989.
216. JANOWITZ, B., CHEGE, J., THOMPSON, A., RUTEN-BERG, N., and HOMAN, R. Community-based
distribution in Tanzania: Costs and impacts of alternative strategies to improve worker
performance. International Family Planning Perspectives 26(4): 158-160, 193-195. Dec.
2000. (Available: < http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2615800.html>, Accessed
Apr. 2, 2001)
217. JANOWITZ, B., HOLTMAN, M., HUBACHER, D., and JAMIL, K. Can the Bangladeshi family
planning program meet rising needs without raising costs? International Family Planning
Perspectives 23(3): 116-121, 145. Sep. 1997. (Available: < http://
www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2311697. html>, Accessed Apr. 2, 2001)
218. JEJEEBHOY, S. Women’s education, autonomy, and repro-ductive behaviour:
Experience from developing countries. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996. 328 p.
219. JEJEEBHOY, S.J. The importance of social science research in protecting
adolescents’ sexual and reproductive choice. Medicine and Law 18(2-3): 255-275. 1999.
220. JENNINGS, V., MURPHY, E., STEELE, C., EISEMAN, E., HUBER, S.C., LION-COLEMAN, A.,
RUDY, S., and WILSON, A. Creating the organizational context for positive client-provider
interaction: A leadership challenge. Washington, D.C., United States Agency for
International Development, 1999. (MAQ Papers No. 1) 18 p.
221. JIMENEZ, E. Pricing policy in the social sectors: Cost recov-ery for education and
health in developing countries. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press. 1987.
222. JOHNS HOPKINS PROGRAM FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAINING IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (JHPIEGO).
Perfor-mance improvement process.
223. JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION PROGRAMS (JHU/CCP).
Distance education works: Improving quality of care by stimulating client demand and
provider skills. [Project Summary]. Balti- more, JHU/CCP, Jan. 1998. (Communication Impact
No. 1) 2 p.
224. JONES, B.S. Emergency contraceptive pills: What does the law say about prescribing,
dispensing, repackaging, and adver-tising? Journal of the American Medical Women’s
Association 53(5 Suppl. 2): S233-237. 1998.
225. KABIR, S. (Population Concern) [Payments in Bangla-desh] Personal communication,
March 12, 2001. 226. KABIR, S.M. and CHAKLADER, H. Contraceptives at your doorstep: Two
urban and two rural areas of Bangladesh. In: Hardon, A. and Hayes, E. Reproductive Rights
in Practice: A Feminist Report on Quality of Care. London, Zed Books, 1997. p. 112-132.
227. KAK, N., THOMAS, M., and UNDERWOOD, C. Re-search findings of the Private Sector
Initiatives Subproject POP/FP III Project. [Draft]. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University,
Population Communication Services, Sep. 15, 1998. 84 p.
228. KALMUSS, D., DAVIDSON, A., CUSHMAN, L., HEARTWELL, S., and RULIN, M. Potential
barriers to the re-moval of Norplant among family planning clinic patients. American
Journal of Public Health 88(12): 1846-1849. Dec. 1998.
229. KANE, T.T., GAMINIRATNE, K.H., and E.H., S. Contraceptive method switching in Sri
Lanka: Patterns and implications. International Family Planning Perspectives 14(2): 68-75.
Jun. 1988.
230. KAPLAN, S.H. and WARE , J.E., JR. The patient’s role in health care and quality
assessment. In: Goldfield, N. and Nash, D.B., eds. Providing Quality Care. Future
Challenges. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Health Administration Press, 1995. p. 25-52.
231. KATZ, J. Reflections on informed consent: 40 years after its birth. Journal of
American College of Surgeons 186(4): 466-474. Apr. 1998.
232. KAZI, S. and SATHAR, Z.A. Productive and reproductive choices: Report of a pilot
survey of urban working women in Karachi. Pakistan Development Review 25(4): 593-608.
Winter 1986.
233. KELLER, A., VILLARREAL, F.S., DE RODRÍGUEZ, A.R., and CORREU, S. The impact of
organization of family planning clinics on waiting time. Studies in Family Planning 6(5):
134-140. 1975.
234. KELLER, S. Updating service delivery guidelines and prac-tices: A workshop on recent
recommendations and experiences, Guatemala City, March 6, 1995. Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, Family Health International, Aug. 1995.
235. KENNEDY, K.I. Post-partum contraception. Bailliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and
Gynaecology 10(1): 25-41. Apr. 1996.
236. KENNEY, G.M. Assessing legal and regulatory reform in family planning. Washington,
D.C., Futures Group International, Jan. 1993. (OPTIONS Policy Paper No. 1) 28 p.
237. KENYA GUIDELINES UPDATE EVALUATION STUDY GROUP. The effectiveness of national
dissemination of updated reproductive health/family planning guidelines in Kenya. [Draft
final report]. Nairobi, Kenya Guidelines Update Evaluation Study Group, Feb. 7, 2001. 20
p.
238. KHALIFA, M.A. Determinants of the choice of source for family planning services in
Egypt. Presented at the Cairo Demographic Center (CDC) 23rd Annual Seminar on Population
and Development Issues in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, Cairo, Dec. 12-14, 1993. p.
26 (Unpublished)
239. KHALIL, K. and MYNTTI, C. Target-setting in family plan -ning programs: Issues and
controversies. Presented at the Population Council Symposium on Family, Gender, and
Population Policy, Cairo, Feb. 7-9, 1994. p. 18 (Unpublished)
240. KHAN, A.R., BOON-ANN, T., and MEHTA, S. Quality of care and target-free approach for
family planning programmes. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the
Pacific, Population Programme, Oct. 4, 1999. 17 p.
241. KHAN, J.R., THAPA, S., and GAMINIRATNE, K.H. Sociodemographic determinants of
contraceptive method choice in Sri Lanka: 1975-1982. In: Tsui, A.O. and Herbertson, M.A.
Dynamics of Contraceptive Use. Cambridge, England, Parkes Foundation, 1989. p. 41-60.
242. KIM, Y.M. Differences in counseling men and women: Family planning in Kenya. Patient
Education and Counseling 39(1): 37-47. Jan. 2000.
243. KIM, Y.M., KOLS, A., BONNIN, C., RICHARDSON, P., and ROTER, D. Client communication
behaviors with health care providers in Indonesia. [Draft]. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins
School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Aug. 25, 2000. 30 p.
*244. KIM, Y.M., KOLS, A., and MUCHEKE, S. Informed choice and decision-making in family
planning counseling in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives 24(1): 4-11, 42.
Mar. 1998.
*245. KIM, Y.M., KOLS, A., THUO, M., MUCHEKE, S., and ODALLO, D. Client-provider
communication in family planning: Assessing audiotaped consultations from Kenya.
Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Jan.
1998. (Working Paper No. 5) 63 p. (Available:
http://www.jhuccp.org/pubs/working_papers/wp5/>)
246. KIM, Y.M., LETTENMAIER, C., ODALLO, D., THUO, M., and KHASIANI, S. Haki Yako: A
client-provider information, education, and communication project in Kenya. Baltimore,
Johns Hopkins University, Center for Communication Programs, Dec. 1996. (IEC Field Report
No. 8) 39 p.
247. KIM, Y.M., MARANGWANDA, C., and KOLS, A. Quality of counselling of young clients in
Zimbabwe. East African Medical Journal 74(8): 514-518. Aug. 1997.
*248. KIM, Y.M., ODALLO, D., THUO, M., and KOLS, A. Client participation and provider
communication in family planning counseling: Transcript analysis in Kenya. Health
Communication 11(1): 1-19. 1999.
249. KIM, Y.M., PUTJUK, F., BASUKI, E., and KOLS, A. Self-assessment and peer review:
Improving Indonesian service providers’ communication with clients. International
Family Planning Perspectives 26(1): 4-12. Mar. 2000.
250. KIM, Y.M., PUTJUK, F., BASUKI, E., and LEWIS, G. “Smart Patient” coaching
in Indonesia: A strategy to improve client and provider communication. Presented at the
SARC 2001 Meeting, Bali, Indonesia, Feb. 2001. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Center for Communication Programs. 28 p.
251. KING, L. “France needs children”: Pronatalism, national -ism and
women’s equity. Sociological Quarterly 39(1): 33-52. Winter 1998.
252. KIRAGU, K., KRENN, S., KUSEMIJU, B., AJIBOYE, J.K.T., CHIDI, I., and KALU, O.
Promoting family planning through mass media in Nigeria: Campaigns using public service
announcements and a national logo. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health,
Center for Communication Programs, Jul. 1996. (IEC Field Report No. 5) 5 p. (Available:
<http://
www.jhuccp.org/pubs/field_reports/fr5/contents.html>, Accessed Mar. 21, 2001)
253. KIRSCH, J.D. and CEDEÑO, M.A. Informed consent for family planning for poor women in
Chiapas, Mexico. Lancet 354(9176): 419-420. Jul. 31, 1999.
254. KLEINMAN, A. Explanatory models in health-care rela-tionships: A conceptual frame for
research on family-based health-care activities in relation to folk and professional forms
of clinical care. [MIT Press Series on the Humanistic and Social Dimensions of Medicine
No. 5]. In: Stoeckle, J.D. Encounters Between Patients and Doctors: An Anthology.
Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1987. p. 273-283.
255. KOENIG, M.A., FOO, G.H., and JOSHI, K. Quality of care within the Indian Family
Welfare Programme: A review of recent evidence. Studies in Family Planning 31(1): 1-18.
Mar. 2000.
256. KOLS, A. and SHERMAN, J.E. Family planning programs: Improving quality. Population
Reports, Series J, No. 47, Baltimore. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population
Information Program, Nov. 1998. 40 p.
257. KONATE, D.L. and CASTLE, S. The impact of family planning on the lives of women in
the district of Bamako, Mali: Interim report after third round of interviews. Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International, 1999.
258. KOST, J., FORREST, J.D., and HARLAP, S. Comparing the health risks and benefits of
contraceptive choices. Family Planning Perspectives 23(2): 54-61. Mar./Apr. 1991.
259. KUMAR, J. Making informed choice real in service deliv-ery. Presented at the
AID/CA’s Meeting on Informed Choice and Tiahrt Amendment, Washington, D.C., Sep. 5,
2000. AVSC International. 4 p.
260. KUMAR, J. (AVSC International) [Donor Requirements] Personal communication, Jan. 12,
2001.
261. KUMAR, S. Health-care camps for the poor provide mass sterilisation quota. Lancet
353(9160): 1251. Apr. 10, 1999.
262. LADJALI, M. Conception, contraception: Do Algerian women really have a choice? In:
Turshen, M. Women and Health in Africa. Trenton, New Jersey, Africa World Press, 1991. p.
125-141.
263. LAMBERT, W. and SIDOTI, N. Choosing instructional lan-guages for educational radio
broadcasts in less developed coun-tries. (World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 491) In:
Feliciano, G., Hancock, A., Hein, G., Horley, A., Jenkins, J., Lambert, W., Perraton, H.,
Sakamoto, T., Sidoti, N., and Tiffin, J. Futagami, S., ed. The Educational Uses of Mass
Media. Washington, D.C., World Bank, 1981. p. 74-93.
264. L’ANCIEN, A. The earthquake at Karlsruhe: Germany finally wakes up to the fact
of its decline? Population et Avenir (641): 6-8. Jan./Feb. 1999.
265. LASEE, A. and BECKER, S. Husband-wife communication about family planning and
contraceptive use in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives 23(1): 15-20, 33.
Mar. 1997.
266. LAZCANO PONCE, E.C., SLOAN, N.L., WINIKOFF, B., LANGER, A., COGGINS, C., HEIMBURGER,
A., CONDE-GLEZ, C.J., and SALMERON, J. The power of information and contra -ceptive choice
in a family planning setting in Mexico. Sexually Transmitted Infections 76(4): 277-281.
Aug. 2000. (Available: www.sextransinf.com)
267. LEI, Z.W., WU, S.C., GARCEAU, R.J., S JIANG, S., YANG, Q.Z., WANG, W.L., and VANDER
MEULEN, T.C. Effect of pre-treatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women
given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contra -ception. Contraception 53(6): 357-361.
Jun. 1996.
268. LEÓN, F.R., MONGE, R., ZUMARÁN, A., GARCÍA, I., and RÍOS, A. Length of counseling
sessions and the amount of rele-vant information exchanged: A study in Peruvian clinics.
International Family Planning Perspectives 27(1): 28-33, 46. Mar. 2001. (Available: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/
2702801.html)
269. LEONARD, A.H. and LADIPO, O.A. Post-abortion family planning: Factors in individual
choice of contraceptive methods. Advances in Abortion Care 4(2): 1-4. Carrboro, North
Carolina, IPAS. 1994.
270. LEOPRAPAI, B. Role of private sector in family planning service delivery. Journal of
Population and Social Studies 7(2): 11-17. Jan. 1999.
271. LLOYD, C. Family and gender issues for population policy. New York, Population
Council, 1993. (Working Paper No. 48) 41 p.
272. LOWES, R. Patient-centered care for better patient adher-ence. Family Practice
Management 5(3): 46-47, 51-54, 57. Mar. 1998. (Available: <http://www.aafp.org/fpm/980300fm/patient.
html>, Accessed Mar. 28, 2001)
273. LUNDGREN, R., PAVÓN, S., and REYES, O. Informed choice. Presented at the Annual
Conference of the American Public Health Association, Boston, 2000. ASHONPLAFA, Honduran
Ministry of Health, Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, p. 27.
274. LUOMA, M. and BEASLEY, D. Performance improvement: Helping workers do their best.
PRIME Series 1(1): 6. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, School of Medicine, Program for International Training in Health, PRIME Project.
1999.
275. LUTZ, W. Future reproductive behavior in industrialized countries. In: Lutz, W. The
Future Population of the World. Laxenburg, Austria, International Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis, 1994. p. 267-294.
276. MAGNANI, R.J., HOTCHKISS, D.R., FLORENCE, C.S., and SHAFER, L.A. The impact of family
planning supply environ -ment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco. Studies in
Family Planning 30(2): 120-132. Jun. 1999.
277. MANTELL, J. Family planning clinics. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute,
Columbia University, 2001.
278. MAQ EXCHANGE. Maximizing Access and Quality (MAQ) Exchange Facilitator Notebook.
Washington, D.C., United States Agency for International Development, 2000. 103 p.
279. MARSHALL, M., JENNINGS, V., and CACHAN, J. Reproductive health awareness: An
integrated approach to obtaining a high quality of health. Advances in Contraception
13(2-3): 313-318. Jun./Sep. 1997.
280. MATHIS, J. Status of national FP/RH guidelines. Washington, D.C., United States
Agency for International Development, May 12-13, 1998.
281. MATTESON, P.S. and HAWKINS, J.W. Women’s patterns of contraceptive use. Health
Care for Women International 18(5): 455-466. Sep./Oct. 1997.
282. MCCAULEY, A.P. and GELLER, J.S. Decisions for Norplant programs. Population Reports,
Series K, No. 4, Baltimore. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information
Program, Nov. 1992. 32 p.
283. MCCAULEY, A.P., ROBEY, B., BLANC, A.K., and GELLER, J.S. Opportunities for women
through reproductive choice. Population Reports, Series M, No. 12, Baltimore. Johns
Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Informa-tion Program, Jul. 1994. 40 p.
284. MCINTOSH, N. and OLIVERAS, E., eds. Service delivery guidelines for family planning
programs. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Reproductive
Health, 1996. 113 p.
285. MCKINSTRY, B. Do patients wish to be involved in deci -sion making in the
consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. British Medical Journal 321:
867-871. Oct. 7, 2000.
286. MEASURE EVALUATION. Short list of QC indicators matched with QC instruments. Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, MEASURE Evaluation, Carolina Population Center, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Oct. 19, 1999. 2 p.
287. MILLER, E.R., SHANE, B., and MURPHY, E. Contracep-tive safety: Rumors and realities.
Washington, D.C., Dec. 1998. 40 p.
288. MILLER, K., MILLER, R., FASSIHIAN, G., and JONES, H. How providers restrict access to
family planning methods: Results from five African countries. In: Miller, K., Miller, R.,
Askew, I., Horn, M.C., and Ndhlovu, L., eds. Clinic-Based Family Planning and Reproductive
Health Services in Africa: Findings From Situation Analysis Studies. New York, Population
Council, Nov. 1998. p. 159-179.
289. MILLER, R., ASKEW, I., HORN, M.C., and MILLER, K. Clinic-based family planning and
reproductive health programs in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Miller, K., Miller, R., Askew, I.,
Horn, M.C., and Ndhlovu, L., eds. Clinic-Based Family Planning and Reproductive Health
Services in Africa: Findings From Situation Analysis Studies. New York, Population
Council, Nov. 1998. p. 245-25
Palavras chave: p, health, s, family, h, population, n, b, abdel-tawab, family planning, abdel-tawab n, report, project, planning, contraceptive, m, d, international family, final report, 92-97 sep 1995 11,
conteúdos relacionados
Search_LibdocFree @SearchWordsAux='Referências Bibliográficas - 1ª Parte p, health, s, family, h, population, n, b, abdel-tawab, family planning, abdel-tawab n, report, project, planning, contraceptive, m, d, international family, final report, 92-97 sep 1995 11, ',@type='ARTICLE', @libdocidant=14195, @max_rows=10, @key_rank=0- Artigo / Publicado em 22 de agosto de 2000
-
09 - Bibliografia - 1ª Parte
- Artigo / Publicado em 22 de agosto de 2000
-
11 - Bibliografia - 1ª Parte
- Artigo / Publicado em 13 de novembro de 2000
-
Bibliografia - 2ª Parte
- Artigo / Publicado em 22 de agosto de 2000
-
Bibliografia - 1ª Parte
- Notícia / Publicada em 13 de janeiro de 2022
-
Estudo diz: “prescreva aspirina com base na relação risco-benefício, e não na idade”
- Notícia / Publicada em 5 de junho de 2015
-
Programa de terapia familiar melhora a depressão em adolescentes diabéticos
- Notícia / Publicada em 20 de maio de 2012
-
Existe associação entre a vitamina D e o câncer de próstata letal?
- Notícia / Publicada em 26 de agosto de 2010
-
Diabéticos apresentam um risco considerável de doenças cardiovasculares devido a fatores comportamentais potencialmente modificáveis
- Notícia / Publicada em 4 de dezembro de 2008
-
Métodos de medicina complementar e alternativa para redução da PA
- Notícia / Publicada em 29 de agosto de 2003
-
Surto de catapora em São Paulo: nota da Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde